FileDigest vs Cursor @docs / context
Cursor's @docs and context features pull references into your editor session. FileDigest produces one portable Markdown digest you can paste into any model — or share, archive, audit.
Quick verdict
When each one wins.
- FileDigest wins when you need a paste-anywhere, model-agnostic Markdown artifact from files.
- Cursor wins when you are coding inside Cursor and want library docs / repo context in the editor's agent loop.
- FileDigest is a separate service with its own dashboard, billing, and (rolling-out) API; Cursor's @docs is bundled with the editor.
- These are not substitutes — they live at different layers of the stack.
Feature comparison
Side-by-side, no hand-waving.
Pricing
What each tier covers.
Cursor pricing covers the editor as a whole; FileDigest meters by tokens regardless of which model you use the output with. Plan tiers are listed for shape only — confirm current pricing on each vendor's site.
Best for
Pick the one that matches your input.
FileDigest is best for
Sharing a context bundle with a teammate
One Markdown file beats screenshots of an editor session. Lives in Slack, GitHub, email — anywhere a file can.
Paste-into-any-model workflows
Use Claude this week, GPT next week, Gemini next month. The digest is model-agnostic.
Audit trails and compliance
A retained, dated digest is a real artifact. Useful for legal review, board pre-reads, regulator asks.
Cursor @docs / context is best for
In-editor coding with reference docs
Cursor wins when you want library docs / repo context inside the editor while writing code.
Agentic edits across a codebase
Cursor's agent operates on your project; FileDigest is not an editor.
FAQ
Quick answers.
Does Cursor replace FileDigest?
Only if you live inside the Cursor editor and your context never leaves it. The moment you want to share a context bundle with a teammate, paste it into Claude or ChatGPT, archive it for an audit, or feed it into a RAG pipeline, you need a portable artifact — that is what FileDigest produces.
Can I use both together?
Yes. Many teams use Cursor for in-editor coding and FileDigest to compile shipping docs / data rooms / RAG ingests that need to live outside the editor. The output is a plain Markdown file — works anywhere.
What about token counting and limits?
Cursor manages context inside its agent loop; you do not see a token report. FileDigest emits a token-aware digest with per-section counts in cl100k_base, o200k_base, Claude, and Gemini tokenizers. Useful when you need to fit a known model's context window before paste.
Is there an API or programmatic access?
FileDigest has a REST API in Business/private beta for issuing jobs and fetching digests. Cursor's @docs is part of the editor product, not a standalone HTTP service for batch ingest.
Start with FileDigest free.
3M tokens / month, no credit card. Drop a folder in and see the digest in roughly a minute.
See pricing